Phoenix Journal · LEV Testing
HSG258 is the HSE's definitive guidance on local exhaust ventilation, and it sits behind every LEV test, report and legal duty you carry. Here is what it says, stripped of the jargon.
The guidance in brief
If you run extraction over a process that puts dust, fume, mist or vapour into the air your people breathe, one HSE document quietly governs how it should be designed, checked and signed off - HSG258.
Its full title is Controlling airborne contaminants at work: A guide to local exhaust ventilation (LEV), now in its third edition. It is not a law, and you will not be prosecuted for failing to follow it word for word. What it does is explain, in practical terms, how to meet the legal duties set out in the Control of Substances Hazardous to Health Regulations 2002 - COSHH. When an HSE inspector wants to know whether your extraction is adequate, HSG258 is the yardstick they reach for, so it pays to understand what it actually asks of you.
The good news is that the document is more readable than its reference number suggests. Underneath the technical detail it follows a simple story - a system has a life, from the day someone designs it to the day it is examined and tested, and each stage has a job to do. Here is that life, step by step.
The LEV lifecycle
The rule everyone asks about
The one number that follows HSG258 around is fourteen months. It does not come from the guidance itself but from COSHH Regulation 9, which requires most LEV systems to have a Thorough Examination and Test at least once every fourteen months. The odd figure exists on purpose - fourteen rather than twelve lets a business hold the test in the same working period each year without the date slowly creeping forward until it is overdue.
Fourteen months is a maximum, not a target, and it is not the interval for everyone. Certain higher-risk processes listed in COSHH Schedule 4 must be examined far more often - as frequently as every six months, and in some cases every month. These are the jobs with the most serious health links, and the shorter interval reflects how much is at stake if the extraction underperforms even briefly. If you are unsure which bracket a process falls into, that judgement is part of what a competent examiner brings.
It helps to see where LEV sits in the bigger picture. Extraction is an engineering control, which means it comes fairly low down the ranking of ways to manage a hazardous substance - you are expected to design the risk out or swap the substance first, and only then reach for equipment that captures what remains. That ranking is worth understanding in its own right, and we set it out in our guide to the hierarchy of control. HSG258 also does not stand alone - it is the practical partner to your wider COSHH duties, and the decision to fit LEV at all should fall out of a proper assessment, which is the ground covered in how COSHH assessments should actually be done.
The thread running through the whole document is honest evidence. A system that captures the cloud, benchmarked when new, checked by its users, maintained to a plan and tested on time gives you something an inspector can trust and, far more importantly, keeps your people breathing clean air.
The essentials at a glance
Strip away the detail and HSG258 asks three things of you - control the cloud at source, prove it works, and keep proving it on a schedule. The figures below are the ones worth committing to memory.
Questions
No, HSG258 is guidance rather than law, so you cannot be prosecuted purely for not following it. However, it explains how to meet the legal duties in the Control of Substances Hazardous to Health Regulations 2002, and HSE inspectors treat it as the benchmark for adequate LEV. In practice, following it is the simplest way to show you are compliant.
The interval actually comes from COSHH Regulation 9, which HSG258 supports - most systems need a Thorough Examination and Test at least every 14 months. Certain higher-risk processes listed in COSHH Schedule 4 must be tested far more often, as frequently as every six months or even monthly. A competent examiner can confirm which interval applies to your process.
Known as TExT, it is the formal LEV inspection set out in HSG258. A competent person examines the whole system, measures airflow against the original commissioning figures, checks hoods, ducts and filters, and issues a written report stating whether exposure is still being controlled. You must keep that report for at least five years.
Phoenix Duct Clean · by the numbers
Phoenix examines and tests local exhaust ventilation to HSG258 and COSHH - measured, reported and certificated, UK-wide.