Phoenix Journal · LEV Testing
The cleanest, most compliant workshops are the ones where dust extraction was designed in from the first drawing. Here is how to plan LEV that captures at source, moves dust reliably and passes its statutory test.
Workshop design
The workshops that stay clean, quiet and compliant are the ones where dust extraction was designed in from the outset - not bolted on once the machines were already bench-tested and the walls were up.
Retrofitting extraction into a finished workshop nearly always means compromise: undersized ducts, awkward runs full of tight bends, and a fan working far too hard to pull a decent flow through it all. Get the design right on paper and you protect two things at once - the health of everyone breathing that air, and your ability to pass a statutory examination without a scramble. Wood dust is a recognised carcinogen linked to nasal and sinus cancer as well as asthma, so the stakes are real and the law is specific. This is a walk through how to design a local exhaust ventilation (LEV) system into a workshop properly, in the order the decisions actually need to be made.
Good LEV design follows the air backwards - from the point where dust is made, through the ducts, to the collector and the fan. Work in this order and each choice sets up the next one cleanly.
A well-drawn system is only half the job - it has to keep people below the legal exposure limits and prove that it does. Under the Control of Substances Hazardous to Health Regulations 2002 (COSHH), wood dust carries workplace exposure limits (WELs) measured as an 8-hour time-weighted average: 3 mg/m³ for hardwood dust and 5 mg/m³ for softwood. Where hardwood and softwood are mixed - which is most real joinery - the tighter hardwood limit of 3 mg/m³ applies to the whole mixture. Designing extraction that comfortably beats those numbers, rather than scraping under them, gives you headroom for the days when every machine is running at once.
Extraction is also only one layer of control. COSHH expects a hierarchy - enclose and extract at source first, then keep housekeeping tight, and only then reach for respiratory protective equipment as a top-up. Sweeping and compressed-air blow-down throw settled dust straight back into the breathing zone, so specify low-energy cleaning and a fixed vacuum point in the design rather than leaving it to a yard broom. Employers also have duties around health surveillance for workers exposed to wood dust, typically starting with a respiratory baseline and continuing with regular checks, so the system you design is protecting people the law is actively watching over.
None of this stays fixed once the workshop opens. Machines move, branches get added, filters load up and fans wear, so a system that was perfect at commissioning drifts over time. That is exactly why COSHH Regulation 9 requires a thorough examination and test of LEV by a competent person at least every 14 months, backed by operator checks in between. If you are fitting out or upgrading a joinery, it is worth reading alongside our guide to controlling dust in a joinery workshop, and if you are still choosing hardware, our buyer's guide to woodworking dust extraction units covers how to match a collector to the design you have drawn.
The final measure of a good extraction design is whether it can be proven to work, again and again, long after the installers have left. A system built with capture at source, correct transport velocities, sensible duct routing and proper test access is one that holds its performance and passes examination without drama. Design it as an afterthought and you inherit years of underperformance, exposure risk and remedial cost. Keep the numbers below in front of you and treat testing as part of the design brief - not a box to tick once the sawdust is already flying.
Questions
Wood dust needs a high minimum transport velocity so it stays suspended and does not settle and pack inside the ductwork - commonly around 20 m/s, far more than you would need for a gas or fume. If a duct is oversized the air slows below that figure and dust silts up; if it is undersized it chokes the flow. Sizing every branch and main to hold transport velocity is a calculation based on HSG258, never a guess.
Under COSHH the workplace exposure limits, as an 8-hour time-weighted average, are 3 mg/m3 for hardwood dust and 5 mg/m3 for softwood dust. Where hardwood and softwood are mixed together, the tighter 3 mg/m3 hardwood limit applies to the whole mixture. Wood dust is a recognised carcinogen, so a well-designed extraction system should aim comfortably below these figures rather than just scraping under them.
COSHH Regulation 9 requires a thorough examination and test of LEV by a competent person at least every 14 months, with a report kept on record. Between those statutory tests, operators should carry out routine daily or weekly checks on airflow and capture at each machine. Designing test points and airflow indicators into the system from the start makes both the statutory examination and the everyday checks far easier.
Phoenix Duct Clean · by the numbers
Phoenix examines and tests local exhaust ventilation to HSG258 and COSHH - measured, reported and certificated, UK-wide.