Phoenix Journal · Ductwork
Before you let any contractor near your extract system, a few quick checks on their insurance and accreditation tell you whether the work - and your own cover - will stand up when it matters.
Buyer's guide
Anyone can print a logo on a van and call themselves a kitchen extract specialist - the paperwork is what tells you whether they can actually stand behind the work, and whether your own insurance will stand behind you.
When you hire a contractor to clean a commercial kitchen extract system, clear a grease-laden duct or carry out an LEV test, you are not just buying labour. You are relying on their insurance to cover any damage or injury, and on their accreditation to prove they work to a recognised standard. If either turns out to be missing or out of date, the risk quietly transfers back to you - and it tends to surface at the worst possible moment, after a fire, a flood or a failed inspection. Checking properly takes twenty minutes and needs no special expertise. Here is exactly what to ask for and how to confirm it is genuine.
Work through these in order. Each one is quick, and any contractor worth hiring will hand the evidence over without hesitation - reluctance or delay is itself a useful answer.
A certificate is only as good as the detail on it, and the most common problems are not forgeries - they are honest documents that simply do not cover the situation. The three things that catch people out are dates, limits and scope. A policy that lapsed last month is worthless today; a £1 million limit looks reassuring until you consider what a serious kitchen fire in a multi-tenant building could cost; and a schedule that describes the business as “general cleaning” may exclude the very extract and duct work you are paying for. Always cross-read all three against the job in front of you.
It is also worth understanding why the standards exist. TR19® Grease is not law, but it is treated as the benchmark by insurers, fire and rescue services and environmental health officers, and it is written to satisfy the duty every “responsible person” carries under the Regulatory Reform (Fire Safety) Order 2005. When a contractor works to that specification and documents grease deposits properly, they are producing the exact evidence your insurer expects to see if it ever has to pay out. When they do not, a claim can be challenged - and the shortfall lands on you, not on them.
Accreditation deserves the same scepticism as insurance. SSIP membership is a genuinely useful signal because it means an independent scheme has assessed the contractor's health and safety arrangements against common core criteria, and it saves you repeating that assessment yourself. But it lapses. Because most memberships are valid for only twelve months, a badge that was earned two years ago tells you nothing about today, which is why checking the live directory entry - rather than a screenshot or a PDF - is the step that actually protects you. The same discipline applies to insurance and to individual qualifications: verify at source, and verify that it is current.
None of this is about distrust for its own sake. The best contractors keep this evidence tidy and hand it over gladly, because compliance is how they win work from careful clients. The purpose of checking is simply to make sure the firm you are trusting with fire safety is the firm the paperwork describes - and that the cover you are relying on will still be there when it counts.
If you record nothing else after your checks, record these. They are the numbers an insurer, a fire officer or an environmental health inspector is most likely to ask you to evidence, and having them to hand turns a stressful conversation into a short one.
Keep a dated copy of each certificate, the SSIP membership number you verified, and the post-clean report for every visit. Together they form a simple compliance trail that shows you carried out reasonable checks - and that protects you as much as it protects the building.
Questions
At a minimum they need Employers' Liability cover, which is a legal requirement for most businesses with staff and carries a statutory minimum of £5 million, plus Public Liability insurance. For work in a live commercial kitchen, a Public Liability limit of £5 million is a common floor and £10 million is often expected on larger sites. Always check the policy is in date and that its listed activities actually include extract or duct cleaning.
Ask for the membership number rather than relying on a logo, then check it directly on the accreditation scheme's own online directory or the SSIP portal. SSIP is the umbrella covering schemes such as CHAS, SafeContractor and SMAS, and most memberships are valid for only twelve months. Verifying the live entry confirms the accreditation is both real and still current.
For kitchen extract cleaning the recognised standard is BESA's TR19 Grease specification, which sets minimum competency levels for the people carrying out and signing off the work. A common benchmark is the BESA Grease Hygiene Technician (GHT) qualification. Ask which technician will actually attend your site and what they are qualified to do, rather than accepting a general company claim.
Phoenix Duct Clean · by the numbers
Phoenix surveys and cleans kitchen and building ductwork to the TR19 standard - measured, cleaned and certificated, UK-wide.