PhoenixDuctClean

Phoenix Journal · Extraction

How Sensors Detect a Failing Extractor Fan

A commercial extract fan rarely fails all at once - it fades, slips or stalls, and a sensor usually notices before anyone in the kitchen does. Here is how the two main sensing methods spot a failing fan, and where each one is blind.

HOW SENSORS DETECT A FAILING EXTRACTOR F
TR19 certificate Before & after photos Filters degreased Fully insured EHO accepted

Kitchen extraction monitoring

A commercial extract fan rarely stops with a bang - it fades, stalls or slips, and the first thing that notices is usually a sensor, not a person.

In a busy commercial kitchen the extract canopy has to keep pulling grease-laden air, heat and combustion products away from the cooking line all shift. When the fan behind it starts to fail - a worn bearing, a slack belt, a motor drawing too much current, or a duct so loaded with grease that airflow collapses - you need to know before the gas keeps burning under a canopy that has quietly stopped clearing the air. That is exactly what a proving sensor is for, and under IGEM/UP/19 it is the device that decides whether gas is allowed to flow at all.

There are two sensing methods that dominate UK kitchens, and they detect a failing fan in completely different ways. One watches the air the fan moves; the other watches the electricity the motor draws. Both are accepted for gas interlock duty, both have real strengths, and both have blind spots worth understanding before you trust one to protect your kitchen. This guide compares them plainly so you can tell what your system is actually watching - and where it might be looking the wrong way.

If your fan keeps cutting out rather than failing outright, read our companion piece on why an extractor fan keeps tripping alongside this one.

Option A: air pressure differential sensing

An air differential pressure switch (often shortened to air DP switch, or ADPS) measures the pressure difference created when the fan actually moves air. A small sensing tube sits in the extract duct or across the fan, and the switch compares that reading against still-air room pressure. When the fan is running and pulling properly the pressure difference is present and the switch stays made; when airflow drops below a set threshold the switch opens. The trip point is typically set in the low tens of pascals, tuned to the specific duct on commissioning.

Because it responds to the air itself, an air DP switch is measuring the thing you actually care about - flow at the canopy - rather than a stand-in for it. That is why it is a long-standing choice for BS 6173 and IGEM/UP/19 gas interlocks, and why it doubles neatly as a dirty-filter and blocked-duct warning: as grease loads the filters and duct the pressure signature shifts, and a well-set system can flag the change.

Pros

  • Senses real airflow, so it catches failures the motor never shows - a snapped or slipping belt, a seized impeller, a disconnected or collapsed duct, or a canopy that has simply stopped pulling.
  • Detects gradual airflow loss from grease-loaded filters and ducts, giving early warning that a clean is overdue rather than waiting for a hard stop.
  • Fully accepted for gas interlock duty under IGEM/UP/19 and BS 6173, and independent of how the motor is wired or driven.
  • Works the same whether the fan is direct drive or belt driven, with no separate belt-slippage monitor bolted on.

Cons

  • The sensing tube and ports can become blinded by grease and dust in a kitchen environment, drifting out of calibration or clogging until the reading is unreliable.
  • Needs correct commissioning and periodic re-checking; a threshold set on a clean system can nuisance-trip once real-world grease and back-pressure build.
  • Fitting is more involved - tappings into the duct, tubing runs and a sensible sensing location all matter, and a poorly placed tube gives a poor signal.
  • It proves airflow, not the fan's health directly, so a labouring motor that still just moves enough air can slip under the threshold unnoticed.

Option B: motor current sensing

A current sensing device watches the electricity feeding the fan motor instead of the air it moves. A current switch or current transducer clamps around the supply cable at the motor connection or in the control panel, and proves that the motor is drawing current in its normal running band. Devices such as the widely used CS2 current switch operate when current flow is present, and integrated interlocks like VentGuard-style panels build the same principle in for both intake and extract fans. If the motor stops, trips or loses a phase, the current disappears and the interlock reacts.

Current monitoring is explicitly accepted under IGEM/UP/19, with one important caveat: where belt-driven fans are used, the belt system must have its own slippage and failure monitoring, because a motor can happily keep spinning and drawing current while a slipping or snapped belt means the impeller has stopped and no air is moving. Sensible panels also delay the gas shutdown - commonly around 30 seconds of proven failure - to avoid nuisance tripping on brief dips.

Pros

  • Simple and reliable to fit - a clamp at the panel or motor, with no duct tappings, sensing tubes or grease-prone ports to maintain.
  • Largely immune to the grease and dust that foul air-side sensors, so it holds calibration well in a dirty kitchen.
  • Instantly catches a dead motor, a tripped supply or a lost phase, and suits centralised monitoring of several fans from one panel.
  • Accepted for gas interlock duty under IGEM/UP/19 and BS 6173, and cost-effective to install and commission.

Cons

  • It proves the motor is turning, not that air is moving - a slipping or broken belt, a fouled impeller or a blocked duct can all leave current flowing while extraction has effectively stopped.
  • On belt-driven fans it must be paired with separate belt slippage and failure monitoring to be compliant, adding parts and points of failure.
  • Gives little useful warning of gradual grease loading, since a clogging duct barely changes the current the motor draws until things are severe.
  • A motor running on a variable-speed drive can sit at low output and still register current, masking a real drop in extraction.

The figures that matter

Key facts to hold onto

Whichever method sits on your fan, the standards behind it are the same, and the sensor is only ever as good as the cleaning and commissioning behind it. These are the points worth remembering when you look at your own interlock.

IGEM/UP/19
The UK standard requiring gas to be cut if kitchen ventilation is not proven running
~30 sec
Typical proven-failure delay before a compliant panel shuts the gas, avoiding nuisance trips
2 methods
Air pressure differential or motor current - both accepted, each with a different blind spot

The recurring theme is that no sensor is a substitute for a clean, well-maintained system. A grease-loaded duct will fool an air DP switch into nuisance trips and hide itself entirely from a current monitor - so scheduled extract cleaning to DW/172 and TR/19 standards is what keeps either sensor honest. It is also worth being clear-eyed about what these devices can and cannot tell you, which we cover in what air quality sensors can and can't tell you.

If you are unsure whether your interlock is watching airflow or current - and whether grease has quietly blinded it - the safest move is a professional inspection alongside a full extract clean, so the sensor and the system it protects are checked together.

Questions

Frequently asked questions

Does an air pressure switch or a current sensor give better warning that my extractor fan is failing?

They warn you about different failures. An air pressure differential switch measures the air the fan actually moves, so it catches a slipping belt, a seized impeller or a blocked duct that a current sensor would miss, and it can hint at gradual grease loading. A current sensor only proves the motor is drawing power, so it reacts instantly to a dead motor or tripped supply but stays blind to a fan that is spinning yet moving no air. Many robust installations use current sensing with the belt-slippage monitoring that IGEM/UP/19 requires, or combine both approaches.

Why did my gas supply shut off even though the extractor fan was still running?

Under IGEM/UP/19 the gas is only allowed to flow while the interlock proves adequate ventilation, so a shutdown usually means the sensor no longer sees enough airflow or current, not that the fan has stopped dead. A grease-fouled air pressure sensing tube, a slipping belt, a heavily loaded duct, or a drift out of calibration can all drop the reading below the trip point. Most panels wait around 30 seconds before isolating the gas to avoid nuisance trips, so a repeated shutdown is a genuine signal to have the fan and interlock inspected.

Can grease build-up stop the sensors from detecting a failing fan?

Yes, and it works in opposite ways for the two methods. On an air pressure differential switch, grease can blind the sensing tube and ports, causing false trips or unreliable readings. A current sensor is largely immune to grease on itself, but a grease-choked duct can strangle airflow while the motor keeps drawing normal current, so the sensor happily proves a fan that is barely extracting. Regular extract cleaning to DW/172 and TR/19 standards is what keeps either sensor honest.

20+ Years of Experience

Phoenix Duct Clean · by the numbers

Kitchen canopies
degreased
4,287
Laundry ducts
cleaned
1,877
LEV systems
tested
1,658
Hours
on site
54,754

Keep your extraction pulling its weight

The right kit only helps if the system stays clean. Phoenix degreases canopies, filters and ductwork to TR19 Grease - UK-wide, overnight.