PhoenixDuctClean

Fire, insurance & risk

Building a fire-safe ductwork maintenance file

One ordered record that proves the extract system is kept safe - certificates, readings, photos, damper and suppression records and a closed-out actions log, ready to hand over.

Certs
In date order
Records
Dampers + more
Closed
Actions tracked
MAINTENANCE FILEDOSSIER
TR19 certificate Before & after photos Filters degreased Fully insured EHO accepted

The short answer

One file, in date order, handed over in minutes

A fire-safe ductwork maintenance file is a single, ordered record that proves the extract system has been kept safe: every TR19 certificate and post-clean report, the readings and photographs, the schedule and its justification, damper and suppression records, contractor accreditation, and a recommendations log closed out. Kept on the premises and current, it is what you hand an inspector, insurer or loss adjuster on request.

The core of the file

Certificates, readings and photographs, in order

At the heart of the file are the TR19 Grease certificates for every clean of the whole system, kept in date order so the interval is visible at a glance. Each should sit with its post-clean verification report and the pre and post grease-thickness readings in microns that prove the clean drove deposits down to target, plus the before-and-after photographs from that visit. Together these turn a claim of maintenance into demonstrable evidence of it.

Add the cleaning schedule itself and a short note justifying the interval - the use band, or the policy's stated frequency, whichever is stricter - so anyone reading the file can see the cadence was chosen deliberately, not by accident.

The supporting sections

Dampers, suppression, access and accreditation

Around that core sit the records that show the rest of the fire strategy is maintained. Where dampers exist in the run, keep their drop-test records; keep an access-panel register so it is clear the system can actually be reached and cleaned; keep fixed-suppression and wet-chemical servicing records and any Class F extinguisher and staff-training evidence. Keep the contractor's accreditation on file too - proof the work was done by a BESA-qualified operative and properly notified.

Then the recommendations log: every action a report raised, tracked to completion. An open recommendation is a live risk and a clear weakness in any later investigation, so closing each one out - and recording that you did - is what makes the file defensible rather than merely full.

Certs
With readings and photos, dated
Records
Dampers, suppression, access
Closed
Recommendations tracked out

How to keep it

One record, on site, retained and cross-referenced

The structure matters as much as the contents. Keep everything as one consolidated record - a bound, ordered folder or a controlled digital equivalent - held on the premises and retained for years, so nothing has to be reconstructed under pressure after an incident. Cross-reference it to the fire risk assessment, which should name the extract system as a hazard and point to where the cleaning evidence lives, and to the policy's cleaning condition, so the assessment, the cover and the records all point at each other.

Done that way, the file answers the two questions every enforcing officer and insurer asks - is the system maintained, and can you prove it - in one place, in minutes. That readiness is the whole point: the evidence is built quietly over time, not scrambled together after a fire.

Questions

Frequently asked questions

What goes in a ductwork maintenance file?

TR19 certificates and post-clean reports for every clean, the pre and post micron readings, before-and-after photographs, the cleaning schedule with its interval justification, damper drop-test and access-panel records, suppression servicing, contractor accreditation, and a recommendations log tracked to completion.

How should the file be structured?

As one consolidated record - a bound, ordered folder or controlled digital equivalent - kept in date order, held on the premises and retained for years, so a complete trail can be handed over in minutes.

Why keep pre and post readings, not just a certificate?

Readings in microns prove the clean actually drove grease deposits down to target rather than simply taking place. They turn a claim of maintenance into demonstrable evidence of it.

Should the file link to the fire risk assessment?

Yes. Cross-reference the file to the FRA - which should name the extract system as a hazard and point to where the cleaning evidence lives - and to the policy's cleaning condition, so all three point at each other.

Why does an open recommendation matter?

An unactioned recommendation is a live risk and an obvious weakness in any later investigation. Tracking each one to completion, and recording that you did, is what makes the file defensible.

20+ Years of Experience

Phoenix Duct Clean · by the numbers

Kitchen canopies
degreased
4,287
Laundry ducts
cleaned
1,877
LEV systems
tested
1,658
Hours
on site
54,754

Let your maintenance file build itself

Every clean we do adds dated, certified evidence to your file. Start a scheduled TR19 Grease contract and keep the record complete.